Attentional Modulation of Brain Responses to Primary Appetitive and Aversive Stimuli

Buck, Cara L.; Cohen, Jonathan D.; Field, Brent; Kahneman, Daniel; McClure, Samuel M.; Nystrom, Leigh E.
Issue date: 2015
Rights:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY)
Cite as:
Buck, Cara L., Cohen, Jonathan D., Field, Brent, Kahneman, Daniel, McClure, Samuel M., & Nystrom, Leigh E. (2015). Attentional Modulation of Brain Responses to Primary Appetitive and Aversive Stimuli [Data set]. Princeton University. https://doi.org/10.34770/s9r8-7j39
@electronic{buck_cara_l_2015,
  author      = {Buck, Cara L. and
                Cohen, Jonathan D. and
                Field, Brent and
                Kahneman, Daniel and
                McClure, Samuel M. and
                Nystrom, Leigh E.},
  title       = {{Attentional Modulation of Brain Response
                s to Primary Appetitive and Aversive Sti
                muli  }},
  publisher   = {{Princeton University}},
  year        = 2015,
  url         = {https://doi.org/10.34770/s9r8-7j39}
}
Description:

Studies of subjective well-being have conventionally relied upon self-report, which directs subjects’ attention to their emotional experiences. This method presumes that attention itself does not influence emotional processes, which could bias sampling. We tested whether attention influences experienced utility (the moment-by-moment experience of pleasure) by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the activity of brain systems thought to represent hedonic value while manipulating attentional load. Subjects received appetitive or aversive solutions orally while alternatively executing a low or high attentional load task. Brain regions associated with hedonic processing, including the ventral striatum, showed a response to both juice and quinine. This response decreased during the high-load task relative to the low-load task. Thus, attentional allocation may influence experienced utility by modulating (either directly or indirectly) the activity of brain mechanisms thought to represent hedonic value.

Show More
# Filename Filesize
1 ReadMe.txt 12.2 KB
2 AE_afni_GroupAnalysis_PLoS.tgz 80.4 MB
3 AE_afni_ae16.tgz 473 MB
4 AE_afni_ae17.tgz 448 MB
5 AE_afni_ae18.tgz 454 MB
6 AE_afni_ae19.tgz 455 MB
7 AE_afni_ae20.tgz 446 MB
8 AE_afni_ae21.tgz 462 MB
9 AE_afni_ae22.tgz 452 MB
10 AE_afni_ae23.tgz 451 MB
11 AE_afni_ae24.tgz 471 MB
12 AE_afni_ae25.tgz 455 MB
13 AE_afni_ae26.tgz 429 MB
14 AE_afni_ae27.tgz 467 MB
15 AE_afni_ae28.tgz 479 MB
16 AE_afni_ae29.tgz 477 MB
17 AE_afni_ae30.tgz 464 MB
18 AE_afni_ae31.tgz 465 MB
19 AE_afni_ae32.tgz 496 MB
20 AE_dicoms_ae16_dicoms.tgz 218 MB
21 AE_dicoms_ae17_dicoms.tgz 225 MB
22 AE_dicoms_ae18_dicoms.tgz 221 MB
23 AE_dicoms_ae19_dicoms.tgz 225 MB
24 AE_dicoms_ae20_dicoms.tgz 219 MB
25 AE_dicoms_ae21_dicoms.tgz 222 MB
26 AE_dicoms_ae22_dicoms.tgz 231 MB
27 AE_dicoms_ae23_dicoms.tgz 222 MB
28 AE_dicoms_ae24_dicoms.tgz 228 MB
29 AE_dicoms_ae25_dicoms.tgz 224 MB
30 AE_dicoms_ae26_dicoms.tgz 227 MB
31 AE_dicoms_ae27_dicoms.tgz 224 MB
32 AE_dicoms_ae28_dicoms.tgz 229 MB
33 AE_dicoms_ae29_dicoms.tgz 233 MB
34 AE_dicoms_ae30_dicoms.tgz 222 MB
35 AE_dicoms_ae31_dicoms.tgz 226 MB
36 AE_dicoms_ae32_dicoms.tgz 234 MB
37 other.tgz 10.5 MB